Saturday, July 6, 2024

توقعات الأبراج اليومية: اكتشف ما يخبئه لك النجوم اليوم

 

                    حظك اليوم لجميع الأبراج (الأحد، 7 يوليو 2024)




برج الحمل: اليوم فرصة للتواصل مع الأصدقاء وتبادل الأفكار. حاول أن تكون أكثر انفتاحًا واستماعًا.

 


برج الثور: قد تواجه تحديات في العمل، حاول التحلي بالصبر والتفكير بطريقة مبتكرة لحل المشكلات.

 



برج الجوزاء: تحلّ بالشجاعة واتخذ القرارات التي كنت تؤجلها منذ فترة طويلة. هذا هو الوقت المناسب للتحرك.

 


برج السرطان: قضاء وقت مع العائلة سيكون مفيدًا لك، ستشعر بالراحة والدعم من أحبائك.

 


برج الأسد: قد تتلقى دعوة لمناسبة اجتماعية، حاول استغلال الفرصة لبناء علاقات جديدة.

 


برج العذراء: احرص على الاسترخاء والاهتمام بصحتك، فقد تكون بحاجة إلى بعض الراحة.

 


برج الميزان: لديك مؤتمر مهم اليوم، كن مستعدًا وحاول تقديم أفضل ما لديك.

 


برج العقرب: هناك فرصة كبيرة تلوح في الأفق، حاول استغلالها بشكل جيد ولا تتردد في اتخاذ الخطوات اللازمة.

 


برج القوس: قد تجد نفسك مشغولًا بمهام متعددة، حاول تنظيم وقتك وتحديد الأولويات.

 


برج الجدي: تحدث مع شريك حياتك وحاول حل أي خلافات قد تكون بينكما.

 


برج الدلو: تحدث مع شريك حياتك وحاول توضيح الأمور التي تزعجك.

 


برج الحوت: قد تواجه بعض التحديات المالية، كن حذرًا في إنفاقك وحاول توفير بعض المال للمستقبل.

 

 

Monday, July 1, 2024

Saturday, June 29, 2024

The Current Situation in Palestine

 

The Current Situation in Palestine

The current situation in Palestine remains a complex and multifaceted issue, involving various political, social, and humanitarian aspects. This region, historically significant and contested, continues to face numerous challenges.

Political Landscape

The political situation in Palestine is marked by ongoing conflict and occupation. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has led to numerous peace talks and negotiations, yet a lasting resolution remains elusive. The Palestinian territories, comprising the West Bank and Gaza Strip, experience varying degrees of autonomy and control, with the West Bank under partial Palestinian Authority governance and Gaza under Hamas control.

Humanitarian Concerns

The humanitarian situation in Palestine is dire, with many residents facing restricted access to basic necessities such as clean water, healthcare, and education. The blockade on Gaza has exacerbated living conditions, leading to high unemployment rates and widespread poverty.

International Response

The international community is divided on the issue, with various countries and organizations advocating for different solutions. Human rights organizations frequently highlight violations and call for adherence to international laws.

Cultural and Social Resilience

Despite these challenges, the Palestinian people continue to demonstrate resilience. Cultural expressions through art, literature, and music remain strong, serving as a form of resistance and identity preservation.




Saturday, September 5, 2020

Coronavirus: When will the crisis end and life return to normal?

Coronavirus: When will the crisis end and life return to normal?





The world is in lockdown  Places that were bustling with the hustle and bustle of daily life have become ghost towns after massive restrictions were imposed - from home quarantines and school closures to travel restrictions and bans on public gatherings.

 This came in response to an outbreak of a fatal disease.  But when will the crisis end?  And when we can continue our lives?

 British Prime Minister Boris Johnson believes the UK may "reverse the course" of the outbreak within the next 12 weeks.

 But even if the number of cases begins to decline in the next three months, we will still be far from the end of the crisis.

 It can take a long time to stop the spread of the virus - perhaps years.

 It is clear that the current strategy of isolating large parts of society is not sustainable in the long run, as the social and economic damage will be catastrophic.

 What countries need is an "exit strategy" - that is, a way to lift restrictions and return to normal.

 However, the Corona virus will not disappear.

 And if the restrictions that are hindering the spread of the virus are lifted, the number of cases will inevitably increase.

 Symptoms: Coronavirus: What are its symptoms and how do you protect yourself from it?
 Possibilities of death: Coronavirus: What are the chances of dying from infection?
 Who is most vulnerable?  Coronavirus: Are women and children less likely to contract the disease?
 How does it spread?  Coronavirus: How Do Few People Spread Viruses?
 Mark Woolhouse, professor of epidemiology and infectious diseases at the University of Edinburgh, says: "We have a big problem in terms of elimination strategy and how to achieve it."

 It is a great scientific and social challenge.

 There are three main ways to get out of this mess:

 Vaccine development
 Sufficient people develop immunity through infection
 Or permanently changing our behavior / society
 These methods will limit the ability of the virus to spread.

 Vaccine development: at least 12-18 months.

 The vaccine is supposed to give the person immunity so that he does not get sick if exposed to the virus.

 The virus cannot spread if enough people, about 60 percent of the population, are immunized from it, a concept known as "herd immunity."

 The first person got an experimental vaccine in the United States this week, after researchers were allowed to skip the usual rules of doing animal testing first.

 Research is being carried out to develop vaccines at an unprecedented speed, but there is no guarantee that they will succeed.

 The vaccine could be ready after 12 to 18 months, if everything goes smoothly.  This is a long time if we look at the unprecedented social restrictions currently imposed.

 "Waiting for a vaccine should not be considered a strategy, this is not a strategy," Woolhouse told the BBC.

 Image caption
 Coughing is a symptom of COVID-19
 The development of normal immunity - after at least two years

 The UK's short-term strategy is to reduce the number of infections as much as possible to not overwhelm hospitals - when they run out of intensive care beds, deaths will rise.

 Once the cases are contained, this may allow for some measures to be lifted for a while - until cases rise again and then we need a new round of restrictions.

 The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, said, "Setting absolute time limits on things is not possible."

 This could lead to the development of what is known as "herd immunity" as more and more people become infected with the virus.

 But that could take years, according to Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London.

 Ferguson said: "In the end, if we continue that for more than two years, then perhaps a sufficient portion of society at that stage has been infected, providing a certain degree of community protection."

 But there is a question mark as to whether this immunity will last for a long time;  Other corona viruses lead to a very weak immune response, and people can catch the same virus several times in their lives.

 Alternatives - There is no clear endpoint
 "The third option is the permanent changes in our behavior that allow us to maintain low rates of transmission," said Professor Woolhouse.

 This may include maintaining some procedures that have been put in place, or strict testing and isolation of patients to try to contain any outbreaks.

 The development of drugs that treat the Covid-19 virus could help the other strategies succeed.

 These drugs may be used as soon as people show symptoms, in a process called "transmission control" to prevent them from passing the infection on to others.

 And it may be useful in treating patients in hospitals to make the disease less lethal and reduce pressure on intensive care departments.  This will allow countries to deal with more cases before needing to reactivate home quarantine.

 It is also beneficial to increase the capacity of the intensive care units;  This will help deal with a larger outbreak of patients.

 I asked the UK's chief medical advisor, Professor Chris Whitty, what was the exit strategy for the Coronavirus crisis.

 "In the long term, it is clear that the vaccine is one way out of this, and we all hope that it will happen as soon as possible," he replied.

 He expected that "science will find solutions worldwide."

Normalization with the Zionist entity ... an unforgivable crime !!

                                              Normalization with the Zionist entity ... an unforgivable crime !!


 



Everyone knows that the Zionist movement and the Zionist entity have committed countless crimes against Arabs, Muslims and Jews, reaching the level of crimes against humanity, and the dilemma against which the free people rise up is the efforts made by Zionism and it asks Arabs and Muslims to accept these crimes and to deal with them as if they did not commit any crime, and he  What is called normalization.


 Normalization with the Zionist entity is building formal and informal political, economic, cultural, scientific and intelligence relations with the Zionist entity, and normalization is a handing over to the Zionist entity of its right to the Arab land in Palestine, its right to build settlements, its right to displace Palestinians, and its right to destroy Arab villages and cities, and this is how normalization takes place.  It is surrender and contentment with the ugliest levels of humiliation, humiliation, and surrender of dignity and rights.


 Normalization means making what is not normal normal, and it does not necessarily mean returning things to normal, as some claim.  In statistics and databases there is a scientific term which is "normalization of data", meaning making statistical data more usable in programming and analysis (Normalization of Data) than it was in its raw state before normalization.  Consequently, there is no need to insist on the use of Zionist resistance instead of resistance to normalization, considering normalization as “an alleged return to a certain situation that was once normal,” as some esteemed friends and colleagues go in all good faith.  So normalization is to make normal relations between two parties whose relations are not currently normal, whether they were previously normal or not ... There is thus nothing wrong with using the term "resistance to normalization" to those who resist normalizing relations between us and the Zionist entity.


 Normalization is a rejected approach


  In the language, the word "normalization" comes to the weight of "activation", as it is a process and a continuous process towards achieving an end, not a single, rapid or non-rapid transient step.  So normalization is a method, performance and mentality whose essence is to break the barrier of hostility with the Zionist enemy in various forms, whether cultural, media, political, economic, tourism, religious, security, strategy or others.


 However, regardless of the form, the thrust of normalization with the Zionist enemy remains the same, which is to make the Jewish presence in Palestine a normal matter, and therefore any action, saying, silence or inaction leads to dealing with the Jewish presence in Palestine as a natural matter that carries a naturalistic meaning.


 Normalization is intended to establish normal relations in various aspects: there is political normalization, economic normalization, diplomatic normalization, and so on.  All these aspects are rejected and do not require great diligence, for they are clear and evident, because normalization with the oppressor is unjust, because it is his admission of his injustice, and this is stated in many places: God Almighty said: O those who believe, do not take my enemies and your enemies.  Al-Mumtaminah: From verse 1).  He also said: “My Lord, with what you have graciously blessed me, I will not be the noon of the criminals” (Al-Qasas: 17).


 And the Prophet (PBUH) said: ((Whoever walks with an oppressor to help him in his oppression, knowing that he is unjust, has left Islam)) (Narrated by Al-Tabarani).  And he said: ((He who assists in a conflict with injustice will not remain in the wrath of God until he is removed)) (Narrated by Ibn Majah).  And he said: ((If you see my nation fearing the unjust to say to him, You are an unjust, then you may bid farewell from them)).


 Thus, the Qur’anic texts and the hadiths of the Prophet are available in concert, indicating in their entirety the inadmissibility of the oppressor to his oppression, and this is in fact the position of reason and transmission, known and approved by international legislation, and this is what Islam stipulated.


 Through this criterion, no sane person doubts the prohibition of normalization with Israel, as long as it insists on injustice and insists on the displacement of the Palestinian people and the usurpation of Arab lands.


 Today, Israel does not recognize any human right for more than six million displaced Palestinians in the land, under the pretext that they left a generation or two ago, while they see the right to emigrate at every moment and whenever they want for the Jews whose ancestors may have passed by seventy generations before Palestine, or that their ancestors  They did not even know anything called Palestine, because they had no connection to the inhabitants of this area.


 Let us ask the history and the science of races, were the inhabitants of Palestine African of the black race in order to give the right to the Ethiopian Falasha Jews to immigrate to the land of Palestine?  Or were the inhabitants of Palestine from the Khazars, the Germans, or other races that were given the right to immigrate to Palestine ?!  On the other hand, the Palestinians, whose traces in Palestine extend to thousands of years, are prevented from returning to their lands, homes and farms after they were driven out.


 Thus, it is based on the previous legal texts, and the reality in which the Israeli enemy is moving;  We declare the prohibition of normalization with Israel as long as it maintains its current policy of oppression, oppression, aggression and occupation of the land.


 As for those who compare his relations with "Israel" and the Hudaybiyah peace.  One of the simplest things to say: This comparison is wrong in several ways, including:


 The Hudaybiyah peace is a truce between two enemies, and it is not compared to establishing peace and normalization with an enemy that continues to usurp the Arab land and displace its people, and peace and normalization in this case is not legally permissible, while a truce is permissible.


 Including: The Hudaybiyah peace was concluded by the leader of the nation at the time, and it was one agreement that preserved the nation’s unity and did not enable its enemies to it.


 And the individual agreements exacerbated the nation’s contract, weakened its strength, strengthened its enemies, and enabled the deadly cancer of Zionism to dare to abide by its belief and ideology.  

 Political normalization


 Through reviewing the stages of the Arab-Zionist conflict, we find that the Zionist entity is the one that insisted on the normalization of relations with the Arabs, and that its policy towards war or toward peace focused mainly on normalization, as it is the main and basic guarantee for Israel's survival in the region.  Israel wanted to establish normal relations with the Arabs, so that the Arabs would accept them as part of the region, and neither their existence nor their right to it would be questioned.  Normal relations have levels of ups and downs, but they remain within the logic of political life and not within a hostile logic in which one party targets the presence of the other.  Acknowledging the existence of Israel suffices it with the obsession of demise and falls within the logic of others' defense of its existence and its continuity, and guarantees it the reassurance that the Arabs will not mobilize the ancient history to formulate their current behavior, as the past turns into mere memories that have no way to interfere in the present or the future.


 Israel was always the strongest and tried through its power to subjugate the Arabs, so they were inflicted by repeated defeats until they were unable to follow what they were calling for.  With some enticing incentives, the Arabs gradually transformed absolute rejection into indecision and then to gradual acceptance until we reached the various normalization levels we are now.  It is true that the normalization impulse oscillates, but not within the logic of rejection, but within the logic of acceptance.


 The normalization of relations with Israel does not involve mere establishment of normal relations with it as is the usual relations between the countries of the world that are not in conflict. Rather, it enters the depth of the Arab and Islamic self and has personal and collective repercussions of a civilized and historical character.  It is not normalizing with the aim of establishing relations that did not exist in the first place, such as establishing a relationship between Egypt and Nepal or between the countries of the Arabian Peninsula and Peru, but rather in the sense of reviewing a long history and reconsidering historical, civilizational and religious dimensions.  It does not involve merely mutual or common interests that yield material benefits on two sides, but rather includes self-awareness and an Arabic reading of history, identity and origins.


 Normalization with the Zionist entity does not have a present dimension, that is, it is devoid of psychological extensions and the constituents of personality and identity, nor is it just a temporary slogan with the aim of overcoming the stage of Arab impotence until things are seen and conditions change. Rather, it permeates a person’s awareness of his impotence to root him as a reality that cannot be overcome or overcome.  As if he was addressing the Arab mind and the Arab psyche, saying: “Impotence has surrounded the Arabs, and it is a reality, but an inevitable fate, and that there is no room for them but to surrender to it and bequeath it to their children to become an educational component against which generations will not rebel. It is the practical translation of the consolidation of defeat in the Arab soul, including what that entails.  Conditions of acceptance not reluctant to defeat. "  In other words, it is an introduction to defeat so that the soul does not feel comfortable in an atmosphere other than defeats and defeats.


 Normalization for Israel does not mean merely establishing commercial relations, legations or embassies, but rather it is supposed to include a review of the concepts of conflict and an understanding of history, religious foundations, etc.  That is, it must be a radical process of reversing the Arab and Islamic view of Israel and the Jews, so that a new Arab Muslim will emerge with new concepts that undermine all of the above with its background and circumstances.  If normalization is not like this, then the roots of the resurgence of the conflict remain latent until the time for them to emerge.  If the conflict is to be permanently buried, the assets, roots and foundations of the formation of the Arab Islamic character must be destroyed.  Accordingly, normalization must be a new life approach and programmed in an effective way that creates new educational and moral values ​​that are commensurate with the stage and form the basis of the future.


 Mechanisms of political normalization


 Within this general framework, Israel saw that the most important guarantee for its continued existence is that it will be accepted by Arabs and Muslims as an integral part of the region and that it will be treated as a state that has the right to exist and live in peace and in normal relations with others like any other country in the region.  That is why, since its establishment, Israel has worked towards searching for means of détente with the Arabs and establishing non-hostile, even normal, relations with them.  It has focused its efforts on the Arab street, on the average Arab person, because he is the rest and not the ruler.  Israel considered that its acceptance as a state in the region by Arab leaders, rulers and leaders is not sufficient as a guarantee for its continuation due to the instability of governance in the Arab world and the inability of the leaders to achieve continuity without the intelligence, guns and prisons.  Acceptance by these collapses with the collapse of their leaders and governments, and it is easy to turn acceptance into rejection if the people have not followed the ranks of acceptance.


 For Israel to be accepted as an integral part of the region and to be recognized thus, popular acceptance of it must be present.  It was not easy and there must be breakthroughs that would make friction between them and the various groups of the Arab people possible.  In light of the widespread hostility to Israel in the Arab world, the usual means of persuasion were not available, and they were faced only with the means of violence and destruction.  In doing so, it needed two things: Arab leaders who were not jealous of their nation and their people and could be managed, and military defeats inflicted upon the Arabs that would lead to accumulated frustrations and entrench the idea of ​​surrender.  This is precisely what prompted former Israeli Prime Minister Ben Gurion to consider paying a large financial bribe to any neighboring Arab leader in order to wage war against Israel and be defeated, so the masses absorb the lesson and decide that there is no point in looking for reasons of strength to fight Israel.


 Israel did not have a big problem in finding suitable leaders through several means. The first is that British colonialism did not leave the region without investing some loyalists of Western countries at the expense of Arab interests.  As for those who were not linked by colonialism immediately before leaving, it was possible to work on it with two means of money and women, which have proven effective in neutralizing many Arab leaders and in their recruitment as well.  As for those who managed to escape the reins of the traps, they remained prey to a state of backwardness, which is characterized by poor professional and moral standards, laziness, tribalism, the absence of a scientific mentality and submission.  Whoever deliberately and polarized the Ummah did not suffer misfortune, then he was backward.  That is why the Arabs were not at the level of preparation for an equal war and the overwhelming majority of their battles over the years were bitter defeats, and the series of defeat did not stop except with Hezbollah, which achieved a crushing victory over Israel in 2000.


 It is assumed, according to the general historical logic, that challenge begets challenge and that the vanquished searches for his mistakes in order to destroy them and accumulate the causes of strength in order to defeat his enemy.  However, the defeats at the Arab level had another effect, which is to raise the level of frustration or increase the intensity of feelings of despair, in preparation for accepting the status quo and accepting it to its cause.  The reason for this is that the Arab leaders, who were not destroyed by defeats, and the peoples did not move against them, followed internal policies that prevented peoples from working towards implementing their desires and rearranging their ranks in order to defend themselves and defeat the aggressors.  Arab leaders used their security apparatus and security forces to suppress the Arab people, and used money to buy consciences and enslave people, and they set up administrations ravaged by corruption that shattered many societal and political ties.  They have wreaked havoc and devastation on the Arab land, turning the Arab into a rubble difficult to collect.  Thus, they pushed him to a corner where he could not say "no", and with it approval of all the forbidden things became possible.  If there is still someone who can oppose, then prison awaits him or death without many people regretting his situation.


 The leaders, rulers and leaders brought us to that point that they reached a long time ago and were unable to reveal and publicly adopt it, which is the point of reconciliation with or acceptance of Israel.  These leaders said yes to negotiation and mutual recognition, and people, especially in Occupied Palestine / 67, took to the streets chanting and dancing to celebrate the victory they had achieved in Madrid and then in Oslo.  Despair has worked in the souls and minds of people to the extent that they danced to what they described over the years as treachery and forbidden taboos that could not be taken.


 Thus, Israel relied on two mechanisms to sow despair and frustration, namely, making Arab clinics capable of being defeated, as they adopted a military mechanism of its own that dominates the region.  The Arab leaders, in turn, relied on two mechanisms, namely, verbal alignment with the aspirations of the masses and their preparation for fragmentation and defeats through their internal and external policies.  The Israeli role was integrated with the Arab leadership role, and the situation ended where Israel wanted - namely, to sit at the negotiating table to make peace with it based on mutual recognition and opening the doors to normal relations.


 The official normalization scramble


 Since the entry into force of the Iranian nuclear agreement, the countries of the region began to move in different directions in an attempt to encircle Iran's internationally recognized regional role.  It is noticeable in this context that the Arab regimes continue to follow the Saudi approach based on two main headings: exaggeration of the so-called "Iranian threat" and normalization with the Zionist entity, and by excluding the option of openness and dialogue with the new Iran that Washington and its Western partners have taken to correct the mistakes of the "diplomatic boycott" and strengthen communication with it.  For the sake of "solving other issues," their peoples have missed a historic opportunity for comprehensive cooperation and the exchange of security and economic interests with a country that has regional influence and weight!


 Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain ... felt after the completion of the historic nuclear agreement with the West that the results of this agreement were not satisfactory to them, which prompted them to fall into the bosom of "Israel", in order to provide them with alleged protection from what they consider the expansion of Iranian influence in the region, in contravention of that.  The rules of political relations that call for an alliance with the countries with which it shares the largest number of common denominators, and thus the chances of achieving interests are much greater. The Gulf regimes saw the Israeli entity as a strong ally despite the lack of the necessary commonalities with it.


 It is a change that is usually followed by other commitments. Israel is no longer an enemy, and therefore there are those who demand from Arab media professionals to open Israeli embassies in some Arab countries ... all the hellish game going on in the Arab world in order to connect some Arabs with Israel, and there is even a race for this purpose, which  Some people call it a fait accompli that must be acknowledged, and they see in it that it is a delay in reaching out to the Israelis ... Arab unity erases its existence, and the one Arab entity changes its form of government if it remains, and Arabism is a word mixed in its opinion and it has left us since it passed away from raising its banner, as for Israel it protects  In his opinion, too, it prevents the fall of its friends and provides them with long life, while it is an unstable entity that draws its strength from Arab weakness, from this Arab other.


 The recent secret visit by Israeli Economy Minister Yuval Steinitz to the UAE amidst tight protection, according to what was revealed by the Zionist enemy media, fully explains the fact of the organic link between Israel and the Gulf states, and indicates the degree of coordination and joint cooperation between the two sides with regard to the work to destroy the Arab countries.  One by one, in addition to trying to work together to weaken any country that stands by the Arab causes, and supports countries facing the Zionist project, especially Iran, especially since the visit of the Israeli official coincided with the entry into force of the nuclear agreement with the West.


 The assertion of the Israeli Channel Two that Abu Dhabi and a number of Arab countries that it called moderate share common interests with Israel seeking to establish an effective partnership with these countries, and that the visit of the Israeli minister is in this direction, also confirms that the Israeli and Gulf agendas prepared to divide the region are the same, and the interests are mutual  Where the rulers of the sheikhdoms see their alliance with the Zionist entity as a guarantee for their survival, while Israel sees the sheikhs as the main path towards liquidating the Palestinian cause, and both sides have one goal, which is to try to destroy Syria as it represents the head of the resistance pyramid in the region.


 However, in investigating the failures and successes on the two fronts of the struggle, the contest between the trenches of reaction and progress, we realize that it was never interrupted even at the height of the reactionary hypocrisy that Saudi Arabia used to call "Arab solidarity" and which Syria knew to be a gateway to lure it into running in the American court, and is looking forward at the same time.  To its becoming a true Arab solidarity and struggle against the Zionist project. What happened is that losing something does not give it. As the successive disappointments of Washington and Riyadh over a third of a century, in reaching the stage of the spread of normalization in the Arab homeland, necessitated breaking Syria’s back, as it is the lever of the national opposition against neglect.  With the land and rights, which has happened since 2011 on the abundance of blood that has been shed, is an American reactionary attempt to undermine the bumpers of the scramble to "Israel", and with the Islamist reactionaries in Libya, Egypt and Syria, the Muslim Brotherhood, known to be reactionary par excellence, is leading them, especially since their defeat in "Balutaj"  Al-Maliki-Al-Sebaei 1954, in front of the progressive national fabric in Syria, that is, the tall edifice in the bumpers of a rush to relieve national responsibility towards the Zionist project.


 The secret Gulf dialogue is continuing with Israel, and their relations have become a practical and undeniable reality, and the scandal of establishing relations with the Zionist enemy no longer raises the shame of the Gulf regimes that strive to relieve international pressure on Israel. Frequent meetings between Gulf and Israeli officials in Tel Aviv, Europe and New York… In 2005  Qatar and Bahrain announced the lifting of the economic embargo on Israel, and in 2006 Hamad Malik of Bahrain appointed a Bahraini Jew, Hoda Nono, as Bahrain’s ambassador to the United States. There are ten Israeli companies that have investments in Dubai, all registered in Cyprus.  Its branch in Britain to establish a camel farm and camel milking center and export it in Dubai.


 And recently, the Arab foreign ministers agreed, in their last meeting in Cairo, to appoint "Ahmed Aboul Gheit" - Mubarak's foreign minister from 2004 to 2011 - as Secretary-General of the League of Arab States to succeed Nabil Al-Arabi. The appointment of "Aboul Gheit" in this position raises many questions, especially  In light of the state of despair experienced by the Arab peoples, the features of which appeared in Morocco's refusal to host the Arab summit, which was scheduled to take place during this month, as well as Nabil Al-Arabi's insistence on rejecting his second term.


 Aboul Gheit’s diplomatic history is full of Arab disasters, the most important and most dangerous of which are: the ratification of Israel’s declaration of war on the Gaza Strip in 2008, and his relentless pursuit to thwart the Gaza summit in the same year, and his close relationship with the Zionist entity, as Aboul Gheit is considered one of the most important tools that he  It is used by "Mubarak" - the strategic treasure of the Zionist entity - and by his intense hostility to the Palestinians, especially the resistance movements, as he threatened the Palestinians to break their legs if they stormed the borders again, and finally it was.


 We are, therefore, facing a new era for the Arab League that will not be better than before, but will be worse than it was, thanks to its new Secretary General and the good relations he has with the Zionist entity, in addition to the fact that its members see in it as nothing but a park for some of its officials, and then we are facing  A university that is dying before the issues of the Arab world and stands with its hands paralyzed in the face of the real dangers of the Arab nation, and in return new blood is pumped into it for the sake of normalization with the Zionist entity and work to transform that first enemy of the Arab peoples into the close friend with whom relations should be in the best condition, and so on.  We will be facing a university for Arab normalization, not a league of Arab states.

Deal of the century


                                           

                                            Deal of the century       





The Deal of the Century or Trump's peace plan is a proposal, or peace plan, aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, prepared by the President of the United States, Donald Trump.  The plan includes the creation of a global investment fund to support the economies of the Palestinians and neighboring Arab countries, and it was expected that Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, would present it during a conference in Bahrain held on June 25 and 26, 2019. Since the morning of its announcement, the Palestinians have shown their great anger and their categorical rejection of the terms and conditions of the deal of the century, outside.  In condemnation marches rejecting her.

Since 2017, the administration of US President Donald Trump has been preparing a plan for peace in the Middle East to end the Arab-Israeli conflict, to be formally submitted in early 2018, and this has been postponed several times, and according to Fox News, the US peace project document contained between 175 and 200 pages.  Many of its contents were circulated in the media and with some concerned parties in the form of leaks.

 After 18 months of planning, US officials developed the proposal by visiting four Arab capitals.  However, it was not ready to be presented to the public officially.  According to the poll conducted by Haaretz, 44% of respondents believe that the deal is in the interest of Israel, while 7% believe that the deal is in favor of the Palestinians.

 details
 The details of the deal were not "officially" announced earlier, and Trump stated at the time that great progress had been made in that deal. In response to a question about that deal, the Jordanian Foreign Minister said: "When the Americans put it forward, we will give our opinion on it."

 In spite of that, many press reports have been issued that dealt with that deal, and it can be summarized in the solution of the Palestinian issue by establishing a Palestinian state without an army in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and Egypt granting additional lands to the Palestinians for the purpose of establishing an airport and factories and for trade and agriculture without allowing the Palestinians to live in it, and the agreement will be concluded.  Based on the size and price of the lands, a suspension bridge will also be constructed between Gaza and the West Bank to facilitate movement.

 After a year of the agreement, democratic elections will be held for the Palestinian government, and every Palestinian citizen will be able to run for elections, and sanctions will be imposed on all parties that reject the deal, including Israel.  Until now, Israel has refused to implement the two-state solution and the return of refugees, and it is difficult to evacuate settlers from the West Bank.

 Bahrain workshop
Main article: Bahrain Economic Peace Conference
 Senior White House Adviser Jared Kushner inaugurated the "Bahrain Workshop" by saying that America wants to see "peace, prosperity and security be achieved for Israelis, Palestinians and everyone."  You touch on the political aspect, indicating that the political aspect of the peace plan will be revealed at the appropriate time.

 A group of countries participated in the Bahrain conference held in Manama under the title "Peace for Prosperity" on June 25, 2019, led by the United States and Israel, and from Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Qatar and Bahrain, and the European Union, in addition to international financial institutions, participated.  Including the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, as well as major companies and businessmen in the region and the world.

 Advertise it
 On January 28, 2020, US President Donald Trump invited both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his rival Benny Gantz and did not invite any Palestinian officials to Washington to launch his peace plan for the sake of resolving the decades-old conflict;  The two met for separate discussions on the Deal of the Century;  Later, President Trump announced the peace plan between Israel and the Palestinians known as the "Deal of the Century" in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who in turn confirmed that the plan offers a "realistic path" to achieving lasting peace in the region.

 The deal of the century stipulated the existence of a four-year transitional phase, pending political changes that would push the Palestinian Authority to abandon its current rejection of the plan, and to declare Israel’s control over 30 percent of the West Bank within the areas known as "C", according to the classifications of the concluded Oslo Agreement.  1993, and Jerusalem will remain unified under full Israeli sovereignty;  By annexing all the settlements in the West Bank, which are more than 100 settlements, with the aim of preventing the return of Palestinian refugees to the occupied territories of Palestine.

 This plan is considered the "most generous proposal" made to Israel, and it also includes the creation of a "symbolic Palestinian state" that no Palestinian leader can accept.

Coronavirus: China and the United States are fighting behind the scenes

                                               Coronavirus: China and the United States are fighting behind the scenes






It is very clear that the time in which we live is not a good time for the world, especially for relations between China and the United States.

 US President Trump has consistently described the Corona virus as "the Chinese virus", while his hard-line Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called it the "Wuhan virus", which are matters that are causing real anger in Beijing.

 President Trump and his foreign minister attacked China for its alleged inaction in the early stages of the spread of the Coronavirus epidemic.  But Chinese government spokesmen categorically rejected any claim that they were not transparent about the announcement of what was going on.

 Meanwhile, rumors spread on social media platforms in China indicating that an American program for germ warfare was the cause of the spread of the epidemic, and a large number of Chinese believed these rumors, although scientists confirmed that the virus’s structure is completely natural and not manufactured.

 But this war between the two giants is not just a war of words, it goes beyond that to something more dangerous.

Earlier this month, when the United States announced that it had decided to close its borders to those coming from several European countries, including Italy, the Chinese government announced that it was sending medical teams and necessary materials to Italy, the European country most affected by the epidemic.  China also sent aid to Iran and Serbia for the same purpose.

 This was a very symbolic moment, as it indicated the behind-the-scenes information and propaganda war.  China is determined to get out of this crisis and its position as a great power is strengthened.

 In fact, the United States is deservedly losing this war at least for the time being, and this fact will not change the recently announced US decision to send an Air Force medical clinic to Italy.

 This is a time when the political and administrative systems of all countries will be tested to the fullest extent, and the ability to lead will be necessary and even crucial.  Political leaders will be judged by the way they dealt with the crisis, the speed with which they acted to address the epidemic, the clarity they have with their people, and the competence they have shown in directing their countries' resources to respond to the spread of the epidemic.

 The spread of the epidemic came at a time when relations between China and the United States were already in crisis.  A recent partial trade agreement did not resolve the trade disputes between the two countries.

 Moreover, the two countries are moving forward with enhancing their military capabilities, in preparation for a possible military conflict in the Asia-Pacific region.  Meanwhile, China has emerged as a regional military superpower, and now China is seeking to assume the leadership position it believes it deserves.

The spread of the Corona epidemic threatens to push China-US relations into a more difficult and dangerous stage.  This may significantly affect the course of the epidemic's spread and the shape of the world after it recedes.  When victory over the virus is declared, the recovery of the Chinese economy will have a vital and important role in rehabilitating the collapsing global economy.

 But at present, Chinese aid is vital in fighting the epidemic, and it is imperative to continue cooperation in exchanging medical and clinical experiences and information.  Moreover, China is a large producer of medical equipment and single-use items such as masks and protective suits, which are essential to care for the injured, whose numbers have reached incredible levels.

 China is, in many fields, the manufacturer of medical materials on which the whole world depends, and it can diversify and expand its production in a way that most other countries of the world cannot.  China will seize the opportunity presented to it, but - according to Trump's critics - the reason is that it was the US president who failed to respond effectively.

 The Trump administration has failed to accept the gravity of the crisis, and viewed it as a new opportunity to confirm its policy of "America first" and to prove its alleged superiority over the rest of the world.  But what is at stake now is world leadership.

 As two experts on Asian affairs - Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs in the Obama administration, and Roche Duchy - said in the recent Foreign Affairs newsletter, “The United States is the world's leading position in the world, and it is the position it has taken on.  During the past seven decades, it was not built on the foundations of wealth and military strength only, but also on the basis of the legitimacy of the method of internal governance in the country and its ability to provide materials and goods on a global scale and its ability and desire to mobilize international responses to disasters and crises.

 The experts say, "The Corona epidemic is a test for the three basic elements of American leadership, so far Washington has not passed the test. While America continues to falter, Beijing is moving quickly and wisely to take advantage of the opportunity that has been created thanks to the mistakes made by the Americans. China is today filling the void, and visualizing itself."  It is the world leader in response to the spread of the epidemic. "

 It's easy to take a skeptical position in these circumstances.  Many people express their surprise at China's exploitation of this crisis for its benefit, especially since the epidemic began to spread in it.  The Chinese government's response to the escalating crisis in Wuhan was classified at first, but since then Beijing has mobilized its enormous resources in an impressive and effective manner.

 As Susan Nossel, Chair of the Board of Directors of PEN America concerned with freedom of the press said in an article published in the Foreign Policy website, "After Beijing acted out of fear of local protests as a result of its denial and mismanagement of the crisis in its early stages, it is now launching a major domestic and international media campaign to promote  "For its strict policy towards the epidemic, to reduce its role in spreading it, and to successfully compare the efforts it exerts with the efforts made by Western countries, especially the United States."

 Many Western commentators believe that China is moving towards adopting more authoritarian and nationalist policies, and they fear that this trend will escalate due to the effects of the epidemic and the resulting economic slowdown.  But these effects will be more severe on the United States.

The spread of the Corona epidemic threatens to push China-US relations into a more difficult and dangerous stage.  This may significantly affect the course of the epidemic's spread and the shape of the world after it recedes.  When victory over the virus is declared, the recovery of the Chinese economy will have a vital and important role in rehabilitating the collapsing global economy.

 But at present, Chinese aid is vital in fighting the epidemic, and it is imperative to continue cooperation in exchanging medical and clinical experiences and information.  Moreover, China is a large producer of medical equipment and single-use items such as masks and protective suits, which are essential to care for the injured, whose numbers have reached incredible levels.

 China is, in many fields, the manufacturer of medical materials on which the whole world depends, and it can diversify and expand its production in a way that most other countries of the world cannot.  China will seize the opportunity presented to it, but - according to Trump's critics - the reason is that it was the US president who failed to respond effectively.

 The Trump administration has failed to accept the gravity of the crisis, and viewed it as a new opportunity to confirm its policy of "America first" and to prove its alleged superiority over the rest of the world.  But what is at stake now is world leadership.

 As two experts on Asian affairs - Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs in the Obama administration, and Roche Duchy - said in the recent Foreign Affairs newsletter, “The United States is the world's leading position in the world, and it is the position it has taken on.  During the past seven decades, it was not built on the foundations of wealth and military strength only, but also on the basis of the legitimacy of the method of internal governance in the country and its ability to provide materials and goods on a global scale and its ability and desire to mobilize international responses to disasters and crises.

 The experts say, "The Corona epidemic is a test for the three basic elements of American leadership, so far Washington has not passed the test. While America continues to falter, Beijing is moving quickly and wisely to take advantage of the opportunity that has been created thanks to the mistakes made by the Americans. China is today filling the void, and visualizing itself."  It is the world leader in response to the spread of the epidemic. "

 It's easy to take a skeptical position in these circumstances.  Many people express their surprise at China's exploitation of this crisis for its benefit, especially since the epidemic began to spread in it.  The Chinese government's response to the escalating crisis in Wuhan was classified at first, but since then Beijing has mobilized its enormous resources in an impressive and effective manner.

 As Susan Nossel, Chair of the Board of Directors of PEN America concerned with freedom of the press said in an article published in the Foreign Policy website, "After Beijing acted out of fear of local protests as a result of its denial and mismanagement of the crisis in its early stages, it is now launching a major domestic and international media campaign to promote  "For its strict policy towards the epidemic, to reduce its role in spreading it, and to successfully compare the efforts it exerts with the efforts made by Western countries, especially the United States."

 Many Western commentators believe that China is moving towards adopting more authoritarian and nationalist policies, and they fear that this trend will escalate due to the effects of the epidemic and the resulting economic slowdown.  But these effects will be more severe on the United States.

America's allies are taking note of all of this.  While these allies may refrain from publicly criticizing the Trump administration, many of them have taken different positions toward China, the security of Chinese technology (such as the position on Huawei), Iran, and other regional issues.

 China is using its experience and knowledge of the Corona epidemic to try to set new principles for its future relations with the United States and others, relations that may turn China into a "power that cannot be replaced."

 China's initiatives in providing aid for efforts to combat the Coronavirus in its neighboring countries - Japan and South Korea - and the provision of necessary medical equipment to the European Union countries can be viewed from this perspective.

 In their essay, Campbell and Duchy make a clear comparison between the present situation and the decline and decline of the British role in the world.  They say that the failed military operation planned by Britain in 1956 to seize the Suez Canal "exposed the deterioration of the British pioneering role and paved the way for the end of Britain's role as a world power."

 And they say, "Today, policymakers in the United States must be aware that their country is not dealing with emergency conditions. The Coronavirus crisis will turn into the Suez crisis as well."

Tuesday, March 31, 2020

The missing six weeks: how Trump failed the biggest test of his life


Main image: Donald Trump arrives to speak the daily coronavirus briefing at the White House last Saturday. Photograph: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images



Within a week of its first confirmed case, South Korea’s disease control agency had summoned 20 private companies to the medical equivalent of a war-planning summit and told them to develop a test for the virus at lightning speed. A week after that, the first diagnostic test was approved and went into battle, identifying infected individuals who could then be quarantined to halt the advance of the disease.

توقعات الأبراج اليومية: اكتشف ما يخبئه لك النجوم اليوم

                      حظك اليوم لجميع الأبراج (الأحد، 7 يوليو 2024) برج الحمل : اليوم فرصة للتواصل مع الأصدقاء وتبادل الأفكار. حاول أن تكو...